Видео

Hey Jared, thanks for the question! The short answer is they handle surprisingly well! Sure, they’re not race skis, but they’ve got the right sidecut for open GS-style turns rather than those short, technical ones. Thanks to a decent amount of camber and a relatively stiff, poppy build, they’ve got plenty of grip when you’re ready to let loose and rip. We had full confidence on fast reds and mellower blacks that you could crank over the edges and let them do their thing. Hope this gives you a better idea!

@@ellisbrigham alr sick thank you. Yeah I don’t want full on racing skis, I was looking to move to the freestyle category, but I do want to go fast on a couple of runs so this is perfect

@@ellisbrigham so for the 101s what size bindings would be the minimum and maximum size

The Armada ARV96 is a solid choice for what you’re looking to do. It’s versatile enough for groomers, blacks, blues, and tree runs, and it handles 180s and other small tricks really well (as you'll no doubt look to the next trick once the 180s are dialled in). If you want to charge harder, you may want to consider stiffer twin tips, but we certainly didn't feel these were lacking on the piste during our tests. Hope that helps 🙂

It's also worth noting that these are an older model. The ARV 94 would be the more recent version.

@@ellisbrigham ok. So if I was choosing between those, arv 100s and the armada edollos which one would be the best

@@Jared_morrow If it's Armada that you want then choose between the ARV 94 and 100 depending on whether you want the extra width of the 100, the Edollo is wrong for what you want. But, if you are thinking 100 underfoot, then definitely take a look at the Stranger as it fits your initial description better than the AR models.

@@ellisbrigham ok

Hi, thanks for the question. As you note in your comment, the difference between the performance levels of the 2 families is similar. With the Forza, the shape is almost identical between 40 and 50, it’s just elements of the construction that make the difference (the 50 uses a V-carbon alloy Matrix and the 40 V-Fibre Glass, making the 40 more forgiving). On the Redster skis, the 5 and the 4 have the same shape, the difference comes from an extra layer of metal stabiliser in the 5, which makes the ski feel more precise, whereas the 4 has a more forgiving nature, making it more suited to lower-level intermediates or skiers who won’t ski so fast. Hope this helps and if you have any further questions, let us know. - Steve

Thank you for watching!

Thanks for watching David :)

Thanks Danny! I didn't time them - I planned for 5 mins but all the faffing took longer especially on the last one getting into a full length wetsuit for Derwentwater. Next time would probably stay in the shortie swimrun wetsuit for the whole duration to save time!

Thanks Joy :) A pleasure to watch your journey!

Hi, which bindings are you looking at specifically? Thanks, Andy

@@ellisbrigham sorry! The strive 14 gw

@@corn5341The 100mm fits, but only just and may need some adjusting depending on the exact mount position. The 115mm fits nicely, there isn’t loads of excessive overhang. So, we’d recommend the 115mm brake. Hope that is useful.

Hello! Considering your skill level, height, and weight, we recommend looking at the 168 cm version. This length provides an ideal balance of stability at speed and manoeuvrability at lower speeds. Happy skiing!

Thank you for your kind comment! Considering your skill level, height, and weight, we’d recommend checking out the 170cm or 163cm versions. The 170 will have a balance of stability at speed and manoeuvrability, but the 163 will feel more manoeuvrable at slower speeds. This will come down to personal preference so, if possible, try demoing both lengths to find your perfect fit.

@@ellisbrigham thanks 🙏

The best bet is to come in-store with your base layer and mid layers so you can try the shells on over the top. Different brands have slightly different fits and you might also find that the next size up might be too big when you don’t have the insulating layer on. Hope this helps Thanks, Andy

Maverick 100ti will feel more powerful and plough through the chop with ease compared to the Backland. If you are looking to save weight for the way up though, and mainly using it in fresh powder then the Backland will be a great choice. Nice and light and the HRZN Tech tip really helps to float the ski in soft snow. The Marverick will feel more stable in more variable conditions though with the Ti layer helping the dampen vibrations for more all mountain use. - Luke

Great to hear, let us know how you get on :)

Thank you for your kind comments. We agree, the Mantra is pretty burly and can certainly take it out of you. The Ripstick Black Edition offers a bit more punch compared to the regular model and is aimed at advanced skiers, so is naturally stiffer than the standard model. However, don’t dismiss the regular Ripstick as it still performs well across the board and you can certainly give it some stick, plus you might say it feels more damp (in a positive way) than the Black Edition! Also, consider these options: Nordica Enforcer 94, Blizzard Rustler 9, Atomic Bent 100 (a slight curveball), Armada Declivity 92ti, or Head Kore 93. These are just a few alternatives. As far as length goes, remember that shorter skis are more manoeuvrable and quicker to turn, while longer skis are stable at high speeds and offer more flotation. If skis have larger rockers and set back contact points, you wouldn’t want to go too short. Length will ultimately come down to personal preference, so if possible, try a few out at our snowdome stores! -Mark

I’ll definitely try these out. Thanks for the advice. 👍

The Forza 50 is the best comparison in terms of ability, but you’re not really comparing like-with-like. The Forza has a shorter radius and slightly narrower waist, feeling quicker edge-to-edge; the Redster is wider and has a longer radius, it feels a bit slower from turn-to-turn but has more versatility in terms of conditions. If you’re skiing solely on pistes then the Forza is a better choice as it is stable enough to handle the conditions when the runs get choppy. Hope this helps!

Thanks for the question Nikola. The stiffness or flex of the boot is related to you as the skier, as opposed to the ski. It’s going to depend on your weight (and to some extent your height), plus your level of skiing, in a very few cases the biomechanics of the skier may dictate a stiffer/higher flex boot too. The best thing is to visit one of our shops and the boot fitters can advise what would be appropriate. Ignoring your weight for the moment and going off your comments, a stiffer boot (120/130) isn’t required, and should you be heavier/more physical then possibly you’d be better looking at a stiffer ski too. Hope that helps. -Steve

Hi, thanks for your message. Having tried them a few months ago, I'd say you do get good arch support. Also our reviewer Rob said, “For such a lightweight comfortable package the Anacapa 2 provides incredible support and leads to a great walking experience.” You can read the full review here: www.ellis-brigham.com/news-and-blogs/hoka-anacapa-2-mid-gore-tex-review If in doubt, I’d recommend heading to one of our stores and trying them for yourself. Hope this helps! Thanks, Andy

Thanks for the feedback! We're glad you enjoyed the video and your experience with Simon at Fort William Ellis Brigham shop. We'll certainly keep your request for more videos featuring Simon in mind. Stay tuned for more great content!

Why? Curious because I ride this ski and feel like it is a bit "bulky" feeling, not much play.. what did you think?

@Stoicvincero I completely agree. Heavy, dead feeling. I sold them after using them for a day. I knew I didn't like them and that wasn't going to change.

Your weight is going to be important, as are previous skis/sizes. If you are lighter and are used to shorter skis then it’s the 177, which would be better for ascending and tighter descents; if you are a medium or heavier build you should look at the 184 which will be more stable. Thanks, Andy

Thanks very much for the feedback @alistairthow1384! Glad to hear the originals have served you well. -Andy

@@ellisbrigham superb job so far. Especially on scrambly bits. Really feel confident in them.

@@alistairthow1384 Glad to hear it! inov-8 have always produced some of the best grip out there and if you combine that with a lightweight and comfortable shoe, you're on to a winner!

Thanks Jannis, we appreciate the feedback :) -Matt

Great question! Navigating layer changes during a downpour can be tricky, but here's a helpful approach: Like you say, the best option might be to find shelter under a tree etc but if that’s not possible, position yourself out of the wind to avoid most of the rain. Swiftly remove your backpack and the layer you want to change while undercover, and put on the new layer as efficiently and quickly as possible. Minimize exposure by staying within the sheltered area. Practice this process beforehand for a smoother experience. Once changed, ensure your gear is properly packed away and continue your hike. Remember, staying dry is crucial for comfort and safety. Thanks, Andy